Clinical Summary Report

Shareable summary of the selected scenario, best modeled strategy, and key drivers.

Back to Dashboard
Prototype

ASH Iron Deficiency Cost-Effectiveness Report

Generated 6/25/2026, 4:41:19 PM · Format: exec · Scope: current

Executive summary

For a cohort of 10,000 general us adults at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY, the preferred diagnostic strategy is Ferritin ≤50 ng/mL, the preferred treatment strategy is Upfront IV iron, and the preferred care pathway is Aggressive detection and faster treatment.

Scenario assumptions

PopulationGeneral US adults
Cohort size10,000
Prevalence12.0%
PerspectiveHealthcare system
Time horizon1 year(s)
WTP threshold$100,000 / QALY

Cost & outcome results

ModulePreferredTotal costQALYsNMB
DiagnosticFerritin ≤50 ng/mL$765,01647.04$3.94M
TreatmentUpfront IV iron$18.35M399.80$21.63M
PathwayAggressive detection and faster treatment$2.40M43.73$1.98M

Sensitivity summary

Tornado analysis indicates results are most sensitive to missed-diagnosis cost, utility gain, and unnecessary-treatment cost. Threshold analysis across willingness-to-pay values from $50,000 to $200,000 per QALY supports robustness of the preferred strategy in this scenario.

Limitations

Results are generated from an illustrative deterministic prototype model. They should not be interpreted as final clinical, policy, or economic conclusions.

Results shown in this report are generated from an illustrative prototype model. They should not be interpreted as final clinical, policy, or economic conclusions.
Back to DashboardEdit AssumptionsView Methods